Get your political fix from an unrepentant political junkie.
March 21, 2016
On one hand, we have had plenty of Republican presidential debates, and they have yielded little insight into what kinds of policies a president Donald Trump would implement. On the other hand, the debates have revealed what kind of president Trump would be: rude, cartoonish, duplicitous, unprincipled, insulting, anti-intellectual, demagogic, superficial, and on and on. But, he knows how to buy politicians, on that we can believe him.
In contrast, the remaining candidates, Ted Cruz and John Kasich, have provided principled and detailed policies. We voters can make informed decisions, partly based on our intellect and partly on our intuition.
The problem with the cult of personality is that intellect and intuition are thrown out the window at 70 m.p.h. Whether Barack Obama or Donald Trump, a cult of personality is based on pure emotion. It is like being in love: the object of your desire can do no wrong, and all signs to the contrary are conveniently disregarded. If the sales axiom is correct, that we make decisions with emotion and justify them with rationale, then the Obama-Trump phenomena are the hallmark of political salesmanship. If Bill Clinton was the used-car salesman of politics, then Obama and Trump sell timeshares in Phoenix.
This axiom applies to the Democratic race, too, because Hillary Clinton’s thirty-year history with scandal and governmental abuse of power, as well as incompetence, and Bernie Sanders’ thirty-year history of little achievement but growing the federal deficit to the detriment of the American economy and moral incentives, prove that Americans are not thinking. They are reacting with emotionalism. Voters are emotionally invested in these candidates and have attached their identities to the candidates.
Which brings us back to the emotionalism of Trumpism. Trump backed out of the Utah debate scheduled for Monday, leaving 50,000 attendees in the lurch. For the frontrunner Trump, lobbyists are now more important than voters, because he could only be hurt by a more demanding debate with Cruz and Kasich. The debate moderators and media coverage of the first three debates played into Trump’s manipulation of the process, whether by accident or design. The breadth and depth of knowledge of the other candidates were ignored in favor of the sensationalized “reality-t.v.” style of political discourse.
The civility of the last debate was a relief for debate watchers, but it was obviously killing Trump’s ego. In his attempt to appear more presidential (read that as intellectual and dignified), Trump could not resort to his usual tactic of juvenile insults and boring hyperbole. The other candidates were allowed to demonstrate their superior qualifications, especially Cruz, whose intellect, powers of reason, and principled moral character make him the obvious choice at this point in the race.
Trump opposition has surpassed Trump support, and Trump knows it, but he will never admit it. According to Real Clear Politics, Cruz trails Trump by about 150 delegate votes on the way to the minimum requirement of 1,237 for the Republican nomination. If Kasich and Marco Rubio had exited the race, “Cruz would have won South Carolina, Arkansas, Kentucky and Louisiana in addition to the states where he already beat Trump . . . Minnesota and Puerto Rico . . . Michigan, Georgia and Virginia would have been close between Trump and Cruz,” according to FiveThirtyEight website.
President Obama’s style and political philosophy breed conflict, a testament to his ideological roots in the radical Left. Hillary Clinton is cut from the same ideological cloth but is less ego-centric. Clinton feels entitled, but she is less narcissistic. (Narcissism is Bill’s expertise.) Clinton is the embodiment of power hungry, but she does not see herself as a messianic figure, as a tamer of oceans. She is simpler: Clinton wants to put coal workers out of a job to further her political career. Trump also thrives on conflict and demagoguery and is narcissistic, like Obama, but his primary motivation is not ideological. He just loves power however he can get it, like Clinton.